Create Meaning, Not Just Authority

Content, at its core, has always had four main purposes: to entertain, inform, inspire, or empower. Leveraging one of those four is what gives it meaning.

But somewhere along the way, we stopped asking what our content means and started asking how much of it we could make.

The industry settled on a convenient explanation for why content wasn't performing: shortened attention spans. So we built an entire optimization logic around the idea that audiences couldn't focus, so the solution was shorter pieces of content, better hooks, faster cuts, more pattern interrupts, higher volume. If you showed up on the right platforms with the right keywords and cadence, you'd build presence, which would eventually translate into authority.

The problem is that the diagnosis was wrong.

The short-attention-span narrative kept the production machine running, kept agencies billing, and kept platform engagement metrics climbing. If the problem was truly attention span, more content, faster content, optimized content should have fixed it. It didn't.

Because the variable was never duration. It was always quality. People have no problem binging eight hours of television in one sitting, reading 1,600-page novels, and spending hours in a Reddit thread. Attention isn't scarce. What's gone is the tolerance for mediocre content that isn't worth any attention. Audiences don't have short attention spans; they have high standards and infinite alternatives.

We obsess over hooks, lose sleep over keywords, and question the validity of our entire strategy after seeing a post flop. None of that gives content meaning. We've strived so hard to gain authority with our content that we forgot what it means to create meaning with it. We're optimizing for presence when we should be building toward resonance.

Content influence has changed. Reach, volume, and publishing cadence worked when supply was constrained. Now, with AI making it faster and cheaper to produce content at scale, and the emergence of a dual-path internet with an AI discovery layer and a human trust layer, we've entered a “resonance economy.” 

In a resonance economy, the brands that win aren't the ones publishing the most. They're the ones whose ideas get picked up, referenced, and built upon by others. It no longer matters how optimized your content is. If you're not leading or adding to a conversation in a way that people actually believe, you're just creating noise. And audiences have gotten good at telling the difference.

So, then how can you create meaning with your content? 

Through something I like to call the Tastemaker Stack. 

The Tastemaker Stack outlines the four layers of creating cultural influence and resonance with your content.  

Something to note here is that more volume does not equate to meaning. Meaning compounds because you have your Story, Strategy, and System (S3 Framework) working in sync, and they’re functioning like an engine where your ideas are starting to accrue interest on their own. 

Let’s dive into each layer: 

At the core of the stack is where you create meaning. This is done through your editorial foundation: your point of view, voice, and category positioning. You want this to be so recognizable that if someone stripped your name off everything you've published, your audience would still know it's you.

This is the layer most people think they have and don't. A point of view isn't a content pillar or a brand voice guide. It's a position on something real in your category, specific enough that someone could disagree with it. Without it, everything upstream is just production.

What it looks like in practice: For a solo operator, it's your media thesis becoming the thing people quote back to you in the comments, in DMs, on calls. For a brand, it's an editorial position that exists independent of whoever is currently running content, sharp enough that a new hire could read it and know exactly what the brand would and wouldn't say.

At this stage, you're not just creating; you're selecting, curating, framing, and contextualizing. This is where you exercise editorial judgment by deciding what signals in your industry or category landscape are worth your audience's attention and why. To successfully shape meaning, you have to understand your POV well enough to filter against it.

This is the most underdeveloped layer in almost every content operation, solo or organizational. The judgment function doesn't happen by default. It requires someone with enough editorial clarity to decide what deserves oxygen and what doesn't. 

What it looks like in practice: For a solo operator, it's the decision about what you cover this week and what angle makes it distinctly yours rather than a recap of what everyone else already said. For a brand, it's the editorial director function, whether or not that title exists, the person whose job is to decide what the brand amplifies, what it ignores, and why. 

At this stage, you're asking how your point of view gets expressed consistently across formats and topics. The question isn't "how do we get this in front of more people?" It's "how does this idea travel across different formats and contexts without losing what makes it meaningful?"

The container changes. The core doesn't. That requires sufficient systemic rigor that individual pieces are recognizably part of the same body of work, even when encountered out of sequence.

What it looks like in practice: For a solo operator, it's the distribution architecture that lets one idea move from a newsletter essay to a LinkedIn post to a podcast conversation without losing coherence in translation. For a brand, it's also the contributor network, the executives, SMEs, employees, and partners carrying the POV into communities and conversations the brand can't reach on its own. That network is where most organizational content functions are completely underdeveloped, and where the most meaning gets lost.

This is the layer where you gain cultural authority. Your ideas get cited, referenced, built upon, and argued with by others. When you reach this stage, you've officially reached tastemaker status, building a reputation that accumulates over time.

This isn't a marketing outcome and doesn’t happen because you optimized for it. It happens because the first three layers were working well enough that your ideas started accruing interest on their own and developing staying power.

What it looks like in practice: For a solo operator, it's your framework showing up in someone else's newsletter, your language being used in conversations you weren't part of, being asked to speak on podcasts because of what you've built, not just who you know. For a brand, it's your positioning appearing in AI overviews, a prospect referencing your content on a sales call you weren't on, earned media that came from the body of work rather than the pitch.

1. Audit by layer, not by channel. 

Most content audits organize by platform or format. Instagram, email, blog, LinkedIn. Run the audit by layer instead. Pull a representative sample of your last 90 days of content and ask: what layer is each piece operating at?

What you'll almost always find is the same imbalance. Most of the content lives at Carry Meaning. There's distribution happening, but not enough Make Meaning underneath it to support what's being distributed. For a solo operator, that looks like a posting schedule with no media thesis anchoring it. For a brand, it looks like six content-producing functions with no governing editorial logic connecting them. The audit surfaces the imbalance and makes the resourcing conversation much easier to have.

2. Diagnose your Shape Meaning gap first. 

Make Meaning and Carry Meaning exist in some form in almost every content operation. There's a point of view somewhere, and there's distribution happening. What's almost universally underdeveloped is Shape Meaning, the editorial judgment layer. The question of what gets amplified and what gets cut, what signals are worth your audience's attention and which ones aren't.

That judgment function doesn't happen by default. For a solo operator, it requires being disciplined enough to ask what angle makes this distinctly yours before you start producing. For a brand, it requires someone whose explicit job is to decide what deserves oxygen and what doesn't. 

3. Build toward Compound Meaning by protecting the core. 

You don't reach Compound Meaning by publishing more. You reach it by maintaining enough coherence between layers that your ideas accumulate rather than dissipate. The most practical move is establishing what doesn't change as the idea travels. What is the throughline across everything you publish? If you can't articulate it, neither can your audience. And if your audience can't track it, your ideas won't travel.

For a solo operator, that throughline is your media thesis, the one organizing idea that every piece of content is in conversation with. For a brand, it's the editorial position that holds across every surface, from the newsletter to the sales deck to the executive LinkedIn post. The container changes. That core doesn't.

4. Use the stack as a brief template. 

Before any piece of content goes into production, the brief should answer two questions: which layer this piece operates at, and what success looks like at that layer? Meaning isn't measured in impressions. It's measured by whether the piece advances your POV in a way that's recognizable and citable, and whether it maintains coherence across your body of work.

For a solo operator, this is a two-minute gut check before you start writing. For a brand, this is a structural addition to the content brief that every producer, agency, or contributor works from. It doesn't add process. It removes the ambiguity that creates rework.

5. Reframe the ROI conversation using the stack. 

Meaning is a long-term play. It requires time, energy, and investment before it's measurable in the ways most stakeholders expect. The stack gives you a structural argument rather than a faith-based one. You're not asking anyone to trust that content builds authority. You're showing them the four-layer architecture, identifying exactly where the current operation breaks down, and making the case for a specific intervention at a specific layer.

For a solo operator, that's the argument you make to yourself when the temptation is to chase what's performing this week instead of building what compounds over time. For a brand, that's the internal business case that turns a philosophical content conversation into an operational one.

So, instead of striving for authority, strive for resonance. The Tastemaker Stack is a structural answer to what it actually takes to move from presence to resonance, from output to authority, from publishing to being cited. 

The brands and operators who build this infrastructure now are the ones whose ideas will still be traveling when everyone else is still trying to fix their hooks.

What’s trending across the interweb

Media news, launches, and insights

What I’m consuming this week