In partnership with

Imagine you're a CMO. You pull three people aside — your head of content, your head of comms, and your head of sales — and you ask each of them the same question: describe our brand voice in three words.

You get something like this:

  • Head of content: bold, curious, accessible

  • Head of comms: credible, authoritative, measured

  • Head of sales: confident, direct, results-driven

Three different people describing what sounds like three different brands. 

This is what I call brand drift.

Brand drift occurs when your brand's voice, narrative, and identity slowly diverge across teams, channels, and functions. It doesn’t happen through any single bad decision, but through hundreds of small ones made independently by people who don't share a standard and don't know they don't share one.

Your press releases don't sound like your blog posts. Your campaigns start from scratch each quarter rather than building on what came before. How you talk about your company on your website differs from how your sales team talks about it in the field, which, in turn, differs from how your creators and partners talk about it on social media. Your brand compounds in some places and resets in others — and it feels like the reset is winning.

Brand drift doesn't arrive all at once. It accumulates one decision at a time.

And in any modern org, there isn’t one center of excellence creating all of the brand’s content. Content gets produced across six different functions, each running its own strategy, its own calendar, its own narrative, and its own definition of success:

  • A content marketing team producing demand-gen content and SEO

  • A PR and comms team handling external narrative and executive visibility

  • A creator and influencer team producing social content through borrowed voices

  • A customer marketing team producing case studies and advocacy content

  • An employee comms team managing internal narrative and employer brand

  • Sales, product, and partner marketing functions producing decks, battlecards, and pitch materials

The result is six teams, each with a different strategy. There’s no shared operating standard or person whose job it is to ask if every piece of content produced across these functions sounds like the same brand. 

Most brands that recognize brand drift reach for solutions that focus on fixing content quality or headcount: hiring more writers, bringing in an agency, or updating the brand guidelines. But the drift comes back because none of those fixes address the underlying operating gap.

Brand drift is not a creative problem; it’s an operational one.

Your brand voice breaks down as you scale because the process breaks down. When six teams operate independently without a shared editorial standard, without a governing voice, and without a single decision-maker holding the narrative, you don't get one brand. You get six variations of a brand. While each might operate just fine on its own, each function is quietly undermining the others.

The question is not whether your brand has experienced drift—it likely has. The question is what it's costing you—in brand equity, in pipeline efficiency, in the AI-generated summaries that describe your company to buyers before they ever reach your owned channels.

Next week, I’ll be diving into the operating model that nobody’s ever built to address it.

🛑 SIGNS & SIGNALS

What’s trending across the interweb

⭐️ NEW & NOTEWORTHY

Media news, launches, and insights

📂 SWIPE FILE

A piece of content that caught my eye 

💻 ON MY CONTENT PLATE

What I’m consuming this week